Posted on June 15, 2016 by Julie Brook, Esq.
A contract is a form of communication that a diverse audience will read and use. Attorneys who focus strictly on the legal terms and not on their word usage may find that style got in the way of substance. Don’t let that happen to you—review and apply these five writing tips whenever you draft a contact of any kind. Continue reading
Filed under: Business Law, Legal Topics, Legal Writing, New Lawyers | Tagged: ambiguitous contract provisions, contract drafting, contract writing, contracts, legal writing, legalese, sexist language | 1 Comment »
Posted on May 11, 2016 by Julie Brook, Esq.
Whatever document you’re drafting—from a memorandum for a partner to a brief for the court—using clear and concise headings and subheadings will take your reader by the hand and lead them smoothly through your document. Here’s some advice from noted appellate attorneys Daniel U. Smith and Valerie T. McGinty on making your headings as useful and effective as possible. Continue reading
Filed under: Legal Writing, New Lawyers, Videos | Tagged: attorneys, headings, legal briefs, legal drafting, legal memorandum, legal writing, table of contents | 1 Comment »
Posted on October 9, 2015 by Julie Brook, Esq.
Almost all motions and demurrers must be supported by a memorandum. Cal Rules of Ct 3.1113. Your supporting memorandum convinces the judge that the law and facts support the order you want. The objective is to persuade—the memo may be your main shot at doing so, as judges issue a tentative ruling or come to the hearing with a ruling in mind based on the motion and response papers. Continue reading
Filed under: Legal Writing, Litigation Strategy, Pretrial Matters | Tagged: attorneys, demurrer, law and motion, legal briefs, legal writing, pretrial motion practice, supporting memorandum | 2 Comments »
Posted on August 12, 2015 by Julie Brook, Esq.
Ambiguity in any writing is annoying, but in a contract it can be devastating if you wrote it, because any ambiguity in a contract is likely to be construed against you. Here are some ways to avoid ambiguity in your next writing. Continue reading
Filed under: Business Law, Legal Topics, Legal Writing, New Lawyers | Tagged: ambiguitous contract provisions, contract drafting, contract interpretation, legal writing | 5 Comments »
Posted on September 15, 2014 by Julie Brook, Esq.
A contract shouldn’t require a Latin-English dictionary to understand it! In fact, there’s generally no reason to use Latin terms or formal legal language (legalese) at all. Use plain English to be sure the contracts and other documents you’re writing are in a language that the parties can read and understand. Here’s a chart to keep handy next time you’re drafting a legal document (or to discreetly slip to a legalese-laden colleague). Continue reading
Filed under: Legal Writing, New Lawyers | Tagged: attorneys, contract drafting, legal drafting, legal writing, legalese, plain English | 8 Comments »
Posted on May 13, 2013 by Julie Brook, Esq.
Do you want to know the secret to making any legal writing stronger? Check out this video with specific tips for improving your next legal brief.
CEB has great On Demand programs to help you improve your legal writing, including Smith and McGinty on Legal Writing and Myron Moskovitz on Winning Appeals and Writs. Check out these and all other CEB programs at ceb.com.
Related CEB blog posts:
© The Regents of the University of California, 2013. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.
Filed under: Legal Writing, New Lawyers, Practice of Law, Videos | Tagged: legal brief, legal writing, writing skills, writing tips | 17 Comments »
Posted on August 15, 2012 by Julie Brook, Esq.
Whether you are drafting a contract or a brief, be conscious of and avoid sexist language. Sexist language can be distracting and/or offending, and may even turn off your reader to your content altogether. Continue reading
Filed under: Legal Writing, New Lawyers | Tagged: biased language, contract drafting, gender-neutral language, legal writing, sexism, sexist language | 13 Comments »