Should You Make an In Limine Motion?

procon_153899206The next time you’re deciding between excluding evidence via a motion in limine or taking your chances at trial, make sure to review this chart of the pros and cons of motions in limine.

An in limine motion is a request made before trial to admit or exclude evidence before the evidence is offered. It’s most commonly used to exclude evidence that might be prejudicial if offered or discussed in front of the jury.

Here are the general advantages and disadvantaging of using a motion in limine:

Advantages of In Limine Motion

Advantages of Introducing
Evidence Without In Limine Hearing

Aids trial planning: you can plan testimony relying on admissibility of evidence in question or can compensate when evidence has been ruled inadmissible.

Permits briefing; gives judge time to consider issue.

May give you more insight into your opponent’s case.

Makes for smoother presentation at trial.

Educates judge about your case.

May create better written record for appeal.

Introducing the evidence during trial may not trigger an objection.

An in limine motion reveals some of your trial strategy.

A written motion allows opposing counsel time to research counter arguments.

It may be advantageous for jury to witness your efforts to admit evidence in the face of obstructionist efforts by opposing counsel.

If the facts favor your position more than the law does, you may want to force the judge to make a quick decision without the opportunity for research.

If you simply present or oppose the evidence during trial, you may catch opposing counsel unprepared and with less opportunity to make a good record.

Motions in limine can be very useful, but they’re still the exception, not the rule; most court decisions on evidence admissibility are made when evidence is offered and objected to during trial.

For expert advice on in limine motions and how to combat evidence objections generally, turn to CEB’s Effective Introduction of Evidence in California, chapter 3.

Check out other CEBblog™ posts on evidence issues, particularly:

© The Regents of the University of California, 2015. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.

6 Responses

  1. […] Should You Make an In Limine Motion? […]

  2. […] Should You Make an In Limine Motion? […]

  3. […] proponent of evidence can counter anticipated objections with a motion in limine before trial starts, but usually counsel counters objections to evidence after the opponent objects […]

Add your comment to the blog post

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: