Estate Planning Family Law Legal Topics New Legal Developments

Going to the Chapel or Staying Alive: Marital Deduction for Registered Domestic Partners after Windsor

blog_78156121It may not be too soon to draw some inferences from the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v Windsor extending federal law benefits of marriage to lawfully married same-sex spouses. 

First, the Court’s emphasis on federalism and communitarian values strongly suggests that marital status for these purposes will be determined by the state of residence. Section 2 of the Defense of Marriage Act (28 USC §1738C), which the Court noted was not challenged in this case, allows states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed under the laws of other states.

Same-sex couples lawfully married anywhere (Edie Windsor was married in Canada) who currently reside in the District of Columbia or one of the 13 states that currently recognize same-sex marriage, including California, will be entitled to the federal law benefits of marriage, including the estate tax marital deduction.

Residents of other states, including couples who now marry in California and then move to Texas (for example) may be out of luck. Nevertheless, there is little to lose by claiming the marital deduction in these cases.

Second, the Court’s decision does not appear to extend the federal law benefits of marriage to California registered domestic partners and others who have entered into substantially equivalent legal unions in other jurisdictions with the same rights and responsibilities as spouses under state law.

California registered domestic partnerships may soon be converted into marriages for same-sex partners after a relatively short opt-out period as occurred in Washington state, where same-sex marriages not dissolved by June 30, 2014, are converted into marriages under legislation enacted in 2012.

Same-sex partners with taxable estates must stay alive until then or get married to obtain a marital deduction.

For continuing coverage of this issue and a wide range of estate planning concerns, turn to CEB’s Estate Planning & California Probate Reporter. For a detailed discussion of the employee benefits issues in California in light of the Windsor decision, check out CEB’s podcast with attorney Teresa Renaker.

Related CEB blog posts:

© The Regents of the University of California, 2013. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.

6 replies on “Going to the Chapel or Staying Alive: Marital Deduction for Registered Domestic Partners after Windsor”

Add your comment to the blog post

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s