Employment Law Legal Topics Tax Law

Is the Money You Got in Your Employment Case Taxable?

If you are skilled and fortunate enough to get a nice monetary recovery for your client in an employment case, you need to understand what part of that recovery is taxable. From your client’s perspective, this issue will be critical.

When an employee sues an employer, the employee must report any part of a settlement or judgment that represents wages as gross income. IRC §61(a). By contract, any payments received by the employee due to personal physical injuries or physical sickness are excluded from gross income. IRC §104(a)(2). The tricky part is the mixed nature of claims in employment actions: as an attorney, you need to carefully examine the recovery to figure out which parts are includable in gross income (i.e., which are taxable) and which parts are excluded from gross income (i.e., which are nontaxable).

The tax treatment of employment recoveries is determined by a couple of things: (1) the character of the payment, and (2) the nature of the underlying claim.

The IRS looks at how the payments made in settlement or in satisfaction of judgment are characterized, i.e., as back pay, severance pay, compensatory damages. The IRS also considers the underlying claims made in an action so as to determine whether a payment is taxable as income to the employee. For example, the IRS analyzes whether a claim was made under any of the federal or state antidiscrimination, whistleblower, or civil rights statutes; whether the claim encompasses common law wrongful termination or other tort claims; or whether the claim encompasses breach of contract claims.

Here’s how it breaks down:

  • Damages for wages or wagelike compensation (e.g., severance pay, front and back pay) are included in the employee’s income and subject to employment withholding and reporting requirements.
  • Damages recovered for personal physical injuries or physical sickness are excluded from the employee’s income and are not subject to employment withholding and reporting requirements.
  • Damages for other types of recoveries, such as punitive damages or emotional distress, are subject to income taxes but not employment taxes.

As a general rule, most employment-related recoveries are included in the employee’s gross income, unless a cause of action has its origin in a physical injury or physical sickness, in which case all damages (other than punitive damages) that flow from it are treated as payments received on account of physical injury or physical sickness whether or not the recipient of the damages is the injured party. For example, damages received by a third party on account of loss of consortium due to the physical injury or physical sickness of the third party’s spouse are excludable from gross income. H Rep No. 737, 104th Cong., 2d Sess. (1996), 96 US Code Cong & Ad News 1677, 1793.

But be warned, the rules for determining whether and how much of a recovery is actually on account of physical injury or physical sickness can be complicated to apply in specific cases.

For everything you need to know about the taxation of judgments and settlements in employment cases, turn to CEB’s Employment Damages and Remedies, chap 9. This is the newest book in CEB’s OnLAW Employment Law Library, a virtual encyclopedia of employment law.

© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.

7 replies on “Is the Money You Got in Your Employment Case Taxable?”

This is an excellent cautionary tale, Julie, that too frequently is not given the consideration it deserves until post-settlement.

Many of the tax consequences you identify can be mitigated by considering a Non-Physical Injury Structured Settlement in advance of concluding negotiations.

Attorneys who take the time to familiarize themselves with PLR 200836019 prior to settlement (that’s key) can potentially help their clients avoid the let-down they feel after winning a lawsuit only to see taxes erode a good portion of their recovery.

A properly implemented Non-Physical Injury Structured Settlement can help clients keep more of their hard-won recovery by choosing to spread their settlement out over a number of years in an effort to maximize tax efficiency.

With employment litigation on the rise, your post couldn’t have been more timely. Thanks!

I’m an employment lawyer and definitely not a tax lawyer. However, an error that I’ve seen made involves a failure to recognize and apply the “above the line” (exclusion from gross income) deduction of attorneys fees in many employment related settlements. The error usually involves a too narrow understanding of the term ” claim of unlawful discrimination” as that term is defined in 28 U.S.C. 62. The deduction is provided at 28 U.S.C. 62(a)(20) and the definition of claim for unlawful discrimination is provided at 28 U.S.C. 62(e)(1) through (e)(18). Perhaps most surprisingly, the definition specifically includes claims under “common law” “regulating any aspect of the employment relationship, including claims for wages, compensation, or benefits, or prohibiting the discharge of an employee . . . ” As a result, most – if not all – employment law settlements allow for an above the line deduction of attorneys’ fees. This can make a huge difference as below the line deductions are severely limited. Detailing all of this would require too much of this limited reply, but I urge everyone to review the cited statutes and the several decent articles which can be located on the web.

Add your comment to the blog post

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s