
Updated on 10/31/12: The ABA Journal reports that the judge refused to issue a gag order to bar comments and blogging by George Zimmerman’s defense lawyer, finding no “overriding pattern of prejudicial commentary” and that an impartial jury could still be seated.
In an admittedly unusual move, the defense team for George Zimmerman, the man charged with murdering Trayvon Martin, has launched a new website, Facebook, and Twitter account to “disput[e] misinformation,” “discourag[e] speculation,” and provide “a voice for Mr. Zimmerman.” The website also seeks donations for Zimmerman’s defense fund. Is this new route for defense counsel a risky maneuver? How would California’s legal ethics rules weigh in? (more…)
Like this:
Like Loading...
Filed under: Criminal Law, Legal Topics, Litigation Strategy, New Legal Developments, Social Media | Tagged: criminal defense, First Amendment, George Zimmerman, gzlegalcase.com, legal ethics, social media, Trayvon Martin, trial publicity | 3 Comments »